![]() The material could also prove damaging in cases where a defendant has previous convictions for child pornography or molestation, he added. The prosecutor would have to demonstrate that the producer of the material intended to elicit a sexual response with the images or that the subscriber viewed the images for sexual arousal. However, proving lascivious intent in court is extremely difficult. code defining child pornography.īut even if the sites don't show minors engaged in sexually explicit conduct, they could be charged for lascivious intent, said Ken Lanning, a retired FBI agent who spent 30 years researching crimes against children and now serves as an expert witness in court cases. Little Boyz, in accordance with the Constitution, believes that the right to view and appreciate nude images of minors in an artistic and aesthetic manner is guaranteed."įor good measure, many of the sites provide a direct link to the U.S. Little Boyz supports the laws of the United States of America and gladly and willingly conforms to these laws. "In the time honored tradition and within the laws of the United States of America and most states and municipalities, the visual depiction and appreciation of the male form, including the pubescent male form, has been and is legal. "Every photo honors the purity and innocence of youth and contains no sexually explicit conduct in accordance with United States Law!" asserts the site. The disclaimers published by Little-Boyz - which boasts of being "the biggest nude boys site" with 20,000 photos and hundreds of movies - is typical of other child erotica pages:
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |